Table of Contents
Virtual try-on technology is changing how customers shop for products such as eyewear, cosmetics, jewellry, footwear, and fashion. Instead of relying only on product photos, shoppers can use their smartphone or computer camera to see how a product looks on them in real time. But how much does it actually cost to build a virtual try-on experience?
The answer depends heavily on the technology you choose. Commercial AR SDKs such as Banuba, DeepAR, and ImagineAR can provide ready-made AR capabilities, while development frameworks such as MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore offer more flexibility but require significantly more engineering work.8th Wall deserves separate consideration because its hosted platform was retired on February 28, 2026, while its open-source technology remains available. This guide compares the pricing models, development costs, advantages, and best use cases of these seven technologies.
Quick Facts
| Platform | Pricing Model | Software Cost | Development Effort | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banuba | Custom, MAU-based | $$$ | Low–Medium | Production-ready face AR |
| DeepAR | MAU-based | $–$$$ | Low–Medium | AR filters & virtual try-on |
| ImagineAR | Custom licensing | $$$ | Medium | Branded AR experiences |
| 8th Wall | Open-source model | Free* | Medium–High | WebAR |
| MediaPipe | Open source | Free | High | Custom computer vision |
| ARKit | Apple platform framework | Free** | High | iOS AR |
| ARCore | Google platform framework | Free*** | High | Android AR |
The hosted 8th Wall platform was retired in February 2026; the current 8th Wall engine is available through its open-source initiative.
Apple charges $99/year for the Apple Developer Program when you need the program’s distribution capabilities.
ARCore itself does not use the same commercial per-user licensing model as commercial face-AR SDKs, although individual Google AR services can have usage quotas.
What Determines Virtual Try-On Cost?
Before comparing individual platforms, it is important to understand that AR SDK pricing is only one part of the total cost.
A complete virtual try-on solution may require:
- AR/face-tracking technology
- 3D product models
- Product catalog integration
- Camera and UI development
- Face or body tracking
- Real-time rendering
- Product scaling and positioning
- Occlusion handling
- E-commerce integration
- Analytics
- Cloud infrastructure
- Device testing
- Ongoing maintenance
For example, an eyewear retailer could technically use a free computer-vision framework, but still spend considerably more on development to achieve accurate glasses positioning, realistic rendering, product selection, and e-commerce integration.
Therefore:
The cheapest AR SDK is not necessarily the cheapest virtual try-on solution.
1. Banuba Pricing
Banuba uses a custom, monthly-active-user (MAU)-based pricing model. There is no standard public price list. According to Banuba’s current pricing information, the quote depends on three major factors: the number of monthly active users, supported platforms, and the feature set included in the SDK.
Additional services such as SDK customization, integration assistance, custom feature development, AR asset development, and AR Cloud are quoted separately.
What makes Banuba suitable for virtual try-on?
Banuba is designed to provide production-ready face AR functionality, which can reduce the amount of computer-vision infrastructure a company has to build internally.
Potential use cases include:
- Eyewear virtual try-on
- Beauty try-on
- Face filters
- Makeup effects
- Accessories
- Face tracking
- Branded AR experiences
Banuba cost level
Software pricing: Custom
Pricing model: MAU-based
Development effort: Low to medium
Best for: Businesses that want a commercial AR solution rather than building face tracking from scratch.
Who should choose Banuba?
Banuba is a strong option for an established e-commerce brand that expects significant traffic and wants to reduce development time.
2. DeepAR Pricing
DeepAR also uses a Monthly Active User pricing model. A user is counted when they access DeepAR SDK features during a month.
DeepAR provides an end-to-end AR framework with pre-built and customizable effects for mobile, web, and desktop applications.
Its licensing system uses license keys to control and track MAU usage.
What can you build with DeepAR?
DeepAR can be used for:
- Face filters
- 3D effects
- Beauty experiences
- Virtual try-on
- Interactive camera experiences
- Custom AR effects
DeepAR effects can include 3D models, textures, animations, materials, sounds, and scripts.
DeepAR cost level
Software pricing: Usage-based
Pricing model: MAU
Development effort: Low to medium
Best for: Startups, consumer applications, AR filters, and virtual try-on experiences.
DeepAR can be particularly attractive when you want a commercial SDK but don’t want to build the complete AR pipeline yourself.
3. ImagineAR Pricing
Imagine WebAR
Image Tracker is a WebAR image-tracking solution from Imagine WebAR that works with Unity WebGL. It allows developers to anchor 3D objects and other digital content to real-world images detected through a device’s camera.
The system uses natural-feature image tracking, meaning developers do not need to place traditional fiducial markers around the target image. When the camera recognizes an image with sufficient visual detail, the AR content can be positioned over or around that image.
This makes Imagine WebAR particularly useful for marketing campaigns, packaging experiences, printed media, educational materials, product demonstrations, interactive catalogs, and other applications where users can scan a physical image with their phone.
Imagine WebAR Pricing
The current Unity Asset Store listing shows $225 for Imagine WebAR – Image Tracker. The listing also provides a free version called ImageTracker-Free, allowing developers to try the plugin before purchasing.
The current listing identifies version 1.9.0, released on June 8, 2026, with a file size of approximately 20.7 MB.
Pricing can change, particularly during Unity Asset Store promotions, so developers should check the current Asset Store listing before making a purchasing decision.
Does Imagine WebAR Require a Monthly Subscription?
A major selling point of Imagine WebAR is its self-hosted approach.
According to the publisher’s Asset Store description, developers can host their WebAR experiences on their own domain or website, similar to hosting a Unity WebGL application. The publisher positions this as an alternative to WebAR platforms that charge recurring hosting, view, or application-ID fees.
This can make it attractive for businesses expecting high traffic or wanting greater control over their WebAR infrastructure.
However, the one-time asset price does not mean that every WebAR project is completely cost-free. Developers still need to consider hosting, domain, development, maintenance, CDN usage, analytics, and other infrastructure costs.
4. 8th Wall Pricing
8th Wall requires special attention in a 2026 pricing comparison.
The hosted 8th Wall platform was retired on February 28, 2026. Existing published experiences are scheduled to continue running until February 28, 2027.
The technology has subsequently moved toward an open-source model. The current 8th Wall website describes the platform as free to use, with no login requirement.
What does that mean for virtual try-on?
8th Wall can be particularly interesting for browser-based AR because users can access WebAR experiences without necessarily downloading a dedicated application.
However, businesses should now think of 8th Wall primarily as an open-source WebAR technology stack, rather than the hosted commercial platform that existed previously.
8th Wall cost level
Software pricing: Free/open source
Hosting: Your responsibility
Development effort: Medium to high
Best for: WebAR and browser-based AR experiences.
This can reduce licensing costs, but companies need to account for their own hosting, development, deployment, and maintenance.
5. MediaPipe Pricing
MediaPipe is fundamentally different from commercial virtual try-on SDKs. It is an open-source computer-vision and machine-learning framework that developers can customize and deploy across platforms. There is therefore no traditional virtual try-on subscription fee comparable to Banuba or DeepAR.
What can MediaPipe provide?
Depending on the solution used, developers can build applications involving:
- Face detection
- Face landmarks
- Hand tracking
- Pose tracking
- Segmentation
- Object detection
- Real-time computer vision
However, MediaPipe does not automatically give an e-commerce business a complete virtual try-on product.
Developers may still need to build:
- Camera integration
- Face tracking
- Landmark processing
- 3D object positioning
- Product scaling
- Rendering
- Occlusion
- Product catalog integration
- UI
- Analytics
MediaPipe cost level
Software pricing: Open source
License cost: Low/free
Development effort: High
Best for: Development teams that want maximum control.
This creates an important distinction:
MediaPipe can minimize licensing costs while increasing engineering costs.
6. ARKit Pricing
ARKit is Apple’s framework for building augmented-reality experiences on supported Apple devices.
ARKit itself isn’t normally purchased as a commercial virtual try-on SDK.
The main Apple developer membership cost is $99 per year for the Apple Developer Program.
ARKit for virtual try-on
ARKit can provide the underlying AR capabilities needed for an iOS virtual try-on application, but your development team still needs to implement the actual product experience.
For an eyewear application, this can include:
- Face tracking
- Glasses positioning
- 3D rendering
- Product scaling
- Product switching
- UI
- Product catalog integration
- Checkout integration
ARKit cost level
Software pricing: No separate ARKit license
Apple Developer Program: $99/year
Development effort: High
Best for: Native iOS applications.
ARKit is therefore attractive to companies with an existing iOS development team.
7. ARCore Pricing
ARCore is Google’s augmented-reality platform and provides AR capabilities for supported Android devices and other development environments. Like ARKit, ARCore isn’t positioned as a commercial virtual try-on SDK with a per-user licensing fee. Google provides ARCore SDKs and APIs for developers to build AR applications. Supported Android devices use Google Play Services for AR to enable AR experiences built with ARCore.
ARCore capabilities
Depending on the use case, developers can use ARCore capabilities for:
- Motion tracking
- Environmental understanding
- Depth
- Plane detection
- AR object placement
- Camera-based experiences
The Depth API, for example, provides depth information that can be used to create more realistic AR experiences.
ARCore cost level
Software pricing: No commercial AR SDK license
Development effort: High
Best for: Android AR applications and custom AR solutions.
Some Google AR services have usage limits. For example, ARCore’s Geospatial API documents quotas for requests and sessions.
Commercial AR SDK vs Open-Source Framework
One of the most important decisions is whether you should buy a commercial SDK or build your own solution.
| Factor | Commercial SDK | Open Framework |
|---|---|---|
| Examples | Banuba, DeepAR | MediaPipe, ARKit, ARCore |
| License cost | Usually higher | Usually lower |
| Development time | Lower | Higher |
| Customization | High | Very high |
| AR features | Often ready-made | Must be implemented |
| Maintenance | Lower | Higher |
| Engineering expertise | Moderate | High |
| Time to market | Faster | Slower |
| Best for | Businesses | Development teams |
Commercial SDK approach
A commercial SDK may provide:
Camera → Face tracking → AR rendering → Product overlay
Much of the underlying technology is already available.
Build-it-yourself approach
With a framework such as MediaPipe, ARKit, or ARCore, the architecture may look more like:
Camera → Detection → Landmarks → Tracking → 3D positioning → Rendering → Occlusion → Product catalog → E-commerce
This gives developers greater control but requires more engineering.
How Much Does a Complete Virtual Try-On Solution Cost?
The SDK is only one component of the overall budget.
A production virtual try-on system may require investment in:
| Component | Cost Impact |
|---|---|
| AR SDK | Low–High |
| Application development | Medium–Very High |
| 3D product models | Low–Medium |
| UI/UX | Low–Medium |
| Product catalog | Medium |
| E-commerce integration | Medium |
| Cloud/backend | Low–Medium |
| Analytics | Low–Medium |
| Device testing | Medium |
| Maintenance | Medium–High |
The final cost depends on the complexity of the experience.
A basic prototype that displays a few glasses on a face can be relatively inexpensive.
A production platform supporting hundreds or thousands of products, multiple devices, accurate tracking, realistic rendering, product recommendations, analytics, and checkout requires considerably more development.
Estimated Cost by Project Type
Rather than looking only at SDK licensing, businesses should consider the total development scope.
Small Proof of Concept
A basic prototype might include:
- One platform
- Basic face tracking
- A few 3D products
- Simple interface
A commercial SDK can make this relatively quick to develop.
Medium E-commerce Implementation
A production e-commerce implementation could include:
- iOS + Android or Web
- Multiple products
- Product catalog
- Product selection
- User accounts
- Analytics
- Responsive UI
- Multiple device tests
Development and integration become much more significant.
Enterprise Virtual Try-On Platform
An enterprise solution may add:
- Multiple platforms
- Large product catalogs
- Advanced tracking
- Realistic rendering
- AI recommendations
- Analytics
- CMS
- Multiple brands
- High traffic
- Cloud infrastructure
- Continuous maintenance
At this level, the development and operational costs can easily become more significant than the initial AR SDK license.
Which Virtual Try-On Software Is Most Cost-Effective?
There isn’t one winner for every business.
Best for fast commercial deployment: Banuba
Banuba makes sense when you want a commercial face AR SDK and don’t want to build the underlying technology yourself. Its pricing is customized based on MAU, platforms, and features.
Best for flexible MAU-based AR: DeepAR
DeepAR is a strong choice for companies looking for a commercial AR framework with usage-based pricing and pre-built/custom effects.
Best for enterprise branded AR: ImagineAR
ImagineAR is better suited to larger branded AR projects and organizations looking for an integrated AR platform rather than simply a low-cost face-tracking library.
Best for open WebAR: 8th Wall
The current 8th Wall direction is open source, following the retirement of its hosted platform in February 2026. This makes it important to evaluate it differently from its previous commercial pricing model.
Best for maximum control: MediaPipe
MediaPipe is attractive when you have an experienced engineering team and want to build a customized computer-vision pipeline without depending on a commercial face-AR SDK.
Best for native iOS: ARKit
ARKit is the natural choice when your virtual try-on experience is specifically designed for Apple’s ecosystem. The Apple Developer Program costs $99 annually.
Best for native Android: ARCore
ARCore is a strong foundation for custom Android AR applications, particularly when your developers need direct control over the AR experience.
How to Reduce Virtual Try-On Costs
Businesses can reduce the total cost of AR try-on by making a few strategic decisions.
1. Start with one platform
Instead of launching iOS, Android, and Web simultaneously, validate the experience on one platform first.
2. Start with a limited product catalog
You don’t necessarily need to digitize thousands of products during the first release.
Start with your best-selling products and expand later.
3. Choose the SDK based on expected MAU
For commercial SDKs, monthly active users can have a major impact on licensing costs.
A solution that is affordable at 1,000 users may not be the best choice at 1 million users.
4. Consider development cost, not just license cost
A free framework may save money on licensing but require significantly more developer hours.
5. Reuse existing 3D assets
If your products already have accurate 3D models, you may be able to reduce content-production costs.
6. Consider WebAR
For some businesses, browser-based AR can eliminate the friction of requiring customers to install an app.
Virtual Try-On Pricing Comparison
| Platform | Pricing Model | License Cost | Development | Customization | Ideal Customer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banuba | MAU + custom quote | $$$ | Low–Medium | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Enterprise/e-commerce |
| DeepAR | MAU | $$–$$$ | Low–Medium | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Startups & businesses |
| ImagineAR | Custom license | $$$ | Medium | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Enterprise AR |
| 8th Wall | Open source | Free | Medium–High | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | WebAR developers |
| MediaPipe | Open source | Free | High | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Engineering teams |
| ARKit | Platform framework | Low | High | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | iOS developers |
| ARCore | Platform framework | Low | High | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Android developers |
Final Verdict: How Much Does AR Try-On Cost?
The cost of virtual try-on software can range from little or no SDK licensing cost to substantial enterprise licensing, depending on the technology and business requirements.
Commercial solutions such as Banuba and DeepAR charge according to usage or customized licensing, but they can significantly reduce development time. Banuba explicitly bases pricing on MAU, platforms, and features, while DeepAR uses MAU-based pricing.
Frameworks such as MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore can provide a lower-cost foundation from a licensing perspective, but companies must budget for considerably more development work.
Meanwhile, 8th Wall has undergone a major pricing and platform change in 2026, with its hosted platform retired and its technology moving toward open-source distribution.
Ultimately, the best solution depends on your:
- Monthly active users
- Target platforms
- Number of products
- Required AR accuracy
- Development resources
- Customization requirements
- E-commerce integration
- Long-term maintenance budget
For a retailer looking to launch virtual try-on quickly, a commercial SDK can often provide the best balance between development cost, time to market, and AR quality. For companies with a strong engineering team and highly specific requirements, an open framework such as MediaPipe, ARKit, or ARCore can provide greater control and potentially lower licensing costs.
FAQs About Virtual Try-On Software Pricing
1. How much does virtual try-on software cost?
The cost varies depending on the AR technology, number of users, platforms, features, and development requirements. Commercial SDKs such as Banuba and DeepAR generally use licensing or usage-based pricing, while frameworks such as MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore can be used without a traditional virtual try-on license. However, free frameworks usually require more development work.
2. Which virtual try-on SDK is the cheapest?
There is no single cheapest option for every project. MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore can minimize software licensing costs, but you need developers to build the try-on functionality. DeepAR has a free tier for up to 10 monthly active users and paid plans starting at $25/month for up to 1,000 MAU.
3. How much does Banuba cost?
Banuba does not publish a fixed public price for its Face AR SDK. Its pricing depends on the selected platforms, features, and monthly active users. Businesses need to contact Banuba for a quote based on their requirements.
4. How much does DeepAR cost?
DeepAR uses a monthly active user (MAU) pricing model. Its current published pricing includes a free tier for up to 10 MAU, $25/month for up to 1,000 MAU, $100/month for up to 5,000 MAU, $500/month for up to 30,000 MAU, and $1,000/month for up to 100,000 MAU. Larger deployments require a custom quote.
5. Is MediaPipe free for virtual try-on?
MediaPipe can be used as a free/open-source foundation for computer-vision applications. However, MediaPipe does not provide a complete e-commerce virtual try-on solution out of the box. Developers still need to implement features such as product positioning, 3D rendering, UI, product catalogs, and e-commerce integration.
6. Is ARKit free to use?
ARKit is Apple’s AR framework and does not require a separate commercial ARKit license. However, businesses that distribute apps through Apple’s developer ecosystem generally need an Apple Developer Program membership, which costs $99 per membership year.
7. Is ARCore free?
ARCore’s SDK does not use the same commercial licensing model as many third-party AR try-on SDKs. Developers can use ARCore to build custom AR applications, although some ARCore services have usage quotas. For example, the Geospatial API has documented request and session limits.
8. Is 8th Wall still a paid AR platform?
Not in its previous form. The hosted 8th Wall platform and paid subscriptions ended on February 28, 2026. The current 8th Wall initiative provides open-source tools and a distributed engine binary that are free to use.
9. What is the difference between an AR SDK and a development framework?
A commercial AR SDK such as Banuba or DeepAR typically provides many ready-to-integrate AR capabilities. A development framework such as MediaPipe, ARKit, or ARCore provides lower-level building blocks that developers use to create their own solution.
This means an SDK can reduce development time, while a framework can provide greater technical control.
10. What additional costs should I consider when building virtual try-on?
The software license is only one part of the total budget. You may also need to pay for:
- AR application development
- 3D product modeling
- UI/UX design
- Product catalog integration
- E-commerce integration
- Cloud infrastructure
- Analytics
- Device testing
- Maintenance and updates
- Technical support
For a large virtual try-on platform, these costs can exceed the AR SDK licensing cost.
11. Is a commercial AR SDK better than building virtual try-on with MediaPipe, ARKit, or ARCore?
It depends on your priorities. A commercial SDK is usually better when speed to market and ready-made functionality are important. Building with MediaPipe, ARKit, or ARCore can be better when you have an experienced development team and need maximum customization and control.
12. Which technology is best for eyewear virtual try-on?
For a production eyewear try-on experience, commercial face-AR SDKs such as Banuba and DeepAR can reduce development effort. DeepAR specifically lists glasses try-on among its supported virtual try-on use cases.
For a fully customized solution, developers can combine computer-vision and AR frameworks such as MediaPipe, ARKit, or ARCore with a 3D rendering engine.
13. Does the number of users affect AR try-on pricing?
Yes, particularly with MAU-based commercial SDKs. DeepAR explicitly bases its subscription plans on the number of monthly active users. Banuba also considers MAU when calculating Face AR SDK pricing.
This is why businesses should estimate both current and future user volume before selecting an SDK.
14. Can I build virtual try-on without paying for an AR SDK?
Yes. You can build a custom solution using technologies such as MediaPipe, ARKit, ARCore, or open-source 3D/WebAR tools. The trade-off is that you will need to invest more in development, testing, optimization, and maintenance.
15. What is the best way to reduce virtual try-on development costs?
Start with a focused MVP. Choose one platform, support a limited number of products, use existing 3D assets where possible, and validate customer demand before expanding.
It is also important to compare total cost of ownership, rather than choosing an SDK simply because its initial license price is lower.
16. Is virtual try-on worth the investment for e-commerce?
For businesses selling visually evaluated products such as eyewear, makeup, jewelry, and fashion accessories, virtual try-on can make the shopping experience more interactive and help customers evaluate products before purchasing.
The business case should be evaluated using metrics such as engagement, conversion rate, product returns, average order value, and repeat purchases—not simply the AR software price.
17. Which virtual try-on platform should a startup choose?
A startup should generally prioritize low initial cost, fast development, scalability, and predictable pricing. DeepAR’s published MAU tiers can make it easier for a small business to estimate early costs, while open frameworks such as MediaPipe can be attractive if the startup has strong internal engineering resources.
18. What is the biggest hidden cost of virtual try-on?
The biggest hidden cost is often development and maintenance, rather than the AR SDK itself.
A production system needs to work across different devices, lighting conditions, cameras, screen sizes, operating systems, and product models. Maintaining accurate tracking and a smooth user experience can require continuous engineering effort.
19. Can virtual try-on work on both mobile and web?
Yes. The appropriate technology depends on the desired experience. Banuba supports platforms including Android, iOS, Web, Unity, React Native, and Flutter, while DeepAR supports platforms including iOS, Android, HTML5, macOS, and Unity.
20. What should I compare before choosing a virtual try-on SDK?
Don’t compare price alone. Evaluate:
- Pricing model
- Monthly active users
- Supported platforms
- Face/body tracking quality
- Product tracking accuracy
- 3D rendering
- Customization
- Web support
- Mobile support
- E-commerce integration
- Analytics
- Technical support
- Licensing restrictions
- Scalability
- Development time
The right solution is the one that provides the best balance between licensing cost, development effort, performance, scalability, and customer experience.
Virtual Try-On Software Comparison Table
| Platform | Pricing Model | Software Cost | Development Cost | Best For | Platforms | Customization | Overall Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banuba | Custom / MAU-based | $$$ | Low–Medium | Production-ready virtual try-on | iOS, Android, Web, Unity, Flutter, React Native | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| DeepAR | MAU-based | $$–$$$ | Low–Medium | AR filters and try-on | iOS, Android, Web, Unity, macOS | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| ImagineAR | Custom licensing | $$$ | Medium | Branded AR campaigns | Mobile and AR platforms | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| 8th Wall | Open-source model | Free* | Medium–High | WebAR experiences | Web | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| MediaPipe | Open source | Free | High | Custom computer vision | Cross-platform | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| ARKit | Platform framework | Free** | High | Native iOS AR | iOS | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| ARCore | Platform framework | Free*** | High | Native Android AR | Android | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
* 8th Wall’s hosted platform was retired in February 2026; its current technology is available through its open-source initiative.
** Apple Developer Program membership is $99/year when distribution capabilities are required.
*** ARCore itself does not use a conventional commercial virtual try-on licensing model.
Which One Should You Choose?
| Requirement | Recommended Option |
|---|---|
| Fastest production deployment | Banuba |
| Flexible commercial AR SDK | DeepAR |
| Enterprise branded AR | ImagineAR |
| Browser-based WebAR | 8th Wall |
| Lowest licensing cost | MediaPipe |
| Maximum iOS control | ARKit |
| Maximum Android control | ARCore |
| Large-scale commercial eyewear try-on | Banuba / DeepAR |
| Fully custom solution | MediaPipe + ARKit/ARCore |
Key takeaway: Don’t compare these platforms by license price alone. A free framework can have a much higher development and maintenance cost, while a paid SDK can reduce engineering time and accelerate your launch. For most businesses, the best choice depends on the balance between licensing cost, development effort, scalability, platform support, and required AR accuracy
Conclusion
Virtual try-on software costs vary widely depending on the technology, platform, number of users, features, and development requirements. Commercial solutions such as Banuba, DeepAR, and ImagineAR can accelerate development by providing ready-made AR capabilities, but their licensing costs may increase as usage and project requirements grow.
On the other hand, MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore can provide a more cost-effective technical foundation, especially for companies with experienced development teams. However, businesses must account for the additional cost of building, testing, maintaining, and scaling the virtual try-on experience.
For businesses choosing an AR try-on solution, the lowest license price should not be the only consideration. Development time, user volume, platform support, customization, tracking quality, scalability, and long-term maintenance can have a much greater impact on the total cost of ownership.
Ultimately, the best virtual try-on technology depends on your business goals. If you need a faster path to a production-ready experience, a commercial AR SDK may be the better choice. If you need maximum control and have strong technical resources, an open or platform-native framework may offer better long-term value.
By comparing both software pricing and total development costs, businesses can choose an AR try-on solution that delivers a strong customer experience while keeping the project financially sustainable.