Custom Virtual Try-On vs SaaS Platform: Which Is Right for Your Business?

Virtual try-on technology is changing how customers shop for products online. Instead of relying only on product images, shoppers can use their smartphone, webcam, or other compatible device to see how products such as glasses, sunglasses, makeup, jewelry, and fashion accessories may look on them.

For businesses considering virtual try-on, one important question comes before development:

Should you build a custom virtual try-on solution or use a SaaS platform?

Both approaches can provide an engaging augmented reality (AR) shopping experience, but they differ significantly in customization, integration, cost structure, scalability, development effort, and control.

For eyewear brands in particular, the decision can affect everything from product catalog management and website integration to face tracking, frame positioning, analytics, and long-term ownership.

This guide explains the differences between custom virtual try-on and SaaS virtual try-on platforms, explores technologies such as Banuba, DeepAR, ImagineAR, 8th Wall, MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore, and explains what businesses should consider before choosing an approach.

What Is Virtual Try-On?

Virtual try-on uses computer vision, augmented reality, 3D rendering, and sometimes artificial intelligence to digitally place a product over a customer’s image or live camera feed.

For example, an eyewear customer can open a product page, activate their camera, and see a pair of glasses positioned on their face in real time.

A typical glasses virtual try-on system needs several technical components:

Face detection
Facial landmark tracking
Head-pose estimation
Product positioning
2D or 3D rendering
Occlusion handling
Lighting and visual adjustments
Camera access
Product catalog integration
Mobile and desktop compatibility

For businesses interested specifically in eyewear experiences, Zeanex Studio’s Virtual Try-On for Glasses provides an example of how virtual try-on can be incorporated into an eyewear shopping experience.

What Is a SaaS Virtual Try-On Platform?

A SaaS, or Software as a Service, virtual try-on platform provides much of the technology as an externally managed service.

Instead of building the complete computer-vision and rendering infrastructure yourself, a business typically integrates the provider’s SDK, API, widget, or platform into its website or application.

Depending on the provider, the solution may include:

Face tracking
AR rendering
Product try-on
WebAR functionality
Product asset management
Analytics
Cloud infrastructure
Technical support
Software updates

The exact features and pricing models vary between providers.

For example, Banuba provides Face AR SDK capabilities for web and native applications, including face tracking and virtual try-on functionality. Its documentation also lists support for features such as face shape detection and pupillary-distance measurement.

DeepAR similarly provides AR virtual try-on functionality for products including glasses, with experiences designed for websites and applications.

How SaaS Usually Works

A simplified SaaS workflow looks like this:

Business → SaaS provider → SDK/API/Web component → Customer camera → Virtual product

The business generally focuses on integrating the solution and preparing its product assets rather than developing the entire AR engine.

What Is a Custom Virtual Try-On Solution?

A custom virtual try-on solution is designed specifically around a company’s products, website, application, customer journey, and technical requirements.

Instead of adopting a standardized platform experience, the business can develop or commission a solution with customized components.

For example, an eyewear company could create:

A customized product-page experience
Its own UI and branding
Custom frame-rendering logic
Integration with Shopify or another commerce platform
Custom product catalog synchronization
Advanced analytics
Custom recommendation systems
Proprietary sizing or fitting logic
Custom customer workflows
Integration with existing business systems

A custom solution can still use third-party technologies underneath. “Custom” does not necessarily mean building every computer-vision component from zero.

A development team might combine technologies such as MediaPipe, ARKit, ARCore, Banuba, DeepAR, or WebAR technologies and then build the business-specific application around them.

Custom Virtual Try-On vs SaaS: Key Differences

The biggest differences can be summarized across several areas.

Factor	Custom Virtual Try-On	SaaS Virtual Try-On
Initial development	Higher	Lower
Time to launch	Usually longer	Usually faster
Customization	Very high	Depends on provider
Infrastructure	Business-controlled or custom-managed	Provider-managed
Product integration	Highly customizable	Usually predefined integrations
UI/UX control	Full	Limited to configurable options
Maintenance	Business/development team	Mostly provider
Updates	Controlled by business	Provider-managed
Scalability	Custom architecture	Usually built into platform
Vendor dependency	Lower if independently built	Higher
Long-term control	High	Depends on provider
Technical expertise required	Higher	Lower

The right choice depends on the business’s technical requirements, resources, product catalog, customer volume, and long-term strategy.

1. Customization

Customization is one of the biggest differences between the two approaches.

Custom Solution

With a custom solution, businesses can control the user experience more deeply.

For example, an eyewear company could create a try-on interface that includes:

Frame color selection
Lens selection
Product recommendations
Face-shape recommendations
Frame comparison
Add-to-cart functionality
Size information
Product details
Customer accounts
Wishlist integration

The try-on system can also be integrated into the exact location where the business wants customers to interact with it.

SaaS Platform

A SaaS platform generally provides predefined functionality that can be configured to match the business.

This can significantly reduce development work, but some highly specific requirements may not be supported.

Key question: Does your business need a unique experience, or is a proven standard workflow sufficient?

2. Development Time

Building a custom system can require significantly more development work.

A custom implementation may involve:

Selecting the computer-vision technology
Designing the AR architecture
Preparing product assets
Building the frontend
Implementing camera functionality
Integrating face tracking
Developing rendering logic
Testing across devices
Integrating ecommerce functionality
Monitoring and maintaining the application

A SaaS platform can shorten this process because the underlying AR technology has already been developed.

For example, Banuba provides SDKs and WebAR capabilities intended to help developers integrate face tracking and AR experiences rather than implementing the entire tracking engine independently.

3. Cost Structure

Cost is another major consideration.

Custom Development Costs

Custom solutions may involve:

Initial development
UI/UX design
Computer vision development
3D asset creation
Cloud infrastructure
Testing
Maintenance
Device compatibility testing
Future feature development

This can create a higher initial investment.

However, the business gains greater control over the technology and architecture.

SaaS Costs

SaaS solutions generally reduce the initial development burden.

Depending on the provider, pricing can be based on factors such as:

Monthly users
API calls
Try-on sessions
Supported platforms
Product volume
Features
Subscription tier

Businesses should therefore calculate total cost of ownership, rather than comparing only the initial price.

4. Ownership and Control

Custom development generally provides greater control over the software architecture and user experience.

A business can decide:

Where data is stored
How products are managed
How the interface works
Which analytics are collected
Which systems are integrated
How new features are developed

With SaaS, some of these decisions depend on the provider.

This does not automatically make SaaS unsuitable. For businesses that prioritize speed and simplicity, provider-managed infrastructure can be useful.

5. Scalability

Both approaches can scale, but they scale differently.

A SaaS provider generally manages the underlying infrastructure and platform updates.

A custom solution requires the business or its technology partner to design and maintain an architecture capable of handling increasing traffic.

For example, a large eyewear retailer may need to consider:

Thousands of products
Large numbers of simultaneous users
Global customers
Multiple ecommerce platforms
Multiple languages
Analytics
Mobile and desktop support

These requirements should be considered before selecting the architecture.

6. Integration With Ecommerce Platforms

Integration is particularly important for online retailers.

A virtual try-on solution may need to communicate with:

Shopify
WooCommerce
Magento
Custom ecommerce platforms
Product databases
Inventory systems
Customer accounts
Shopping carts
Analytics platforms

A SaaS solution may provide prebuilt integrations or APIs.

A custom solution can be designed around the company’s existing architecture.

For an eyewear company using Shopify, for example, the experience might be:

Product Page → Try On → Select Frame → View on Face → Add to Cart

The closer the try-on experience is to the normal shopping journey, the less friction customers may experience.

7. Choosing the Right Technology

The technology underneath a virtual try-on solution is just as important as the delivery model.

Several technologies can be used depending on the requirements.

Banuba

Banuba provides AR and face-tracking technologies for mobile, web, and other platforms.

Its Face AR SDK includes face tracking and AR capabilities, while its WebAR offering supports browser-based experiences. Banuba also specifically provides virtual try-on capabilities for products such as glasses.

For businesses looking for an established commercial AR SDK, Banuba can be considered as part of either a SaaS-oriented implementation or a custom application architecture.

DeepAR

DeepAR provides AR tools for commerce use cases and supports virtual try-on experiences for products including glasses.

Its platform can be used to create AR experiences within websites and applications, while its services also include tools related to 3D assets and content management.

DeepAR can therefore be considered when a business wants commercial AR capabilities without developing the entire tracking technology independently.

ImagineAR

ImagineAR provides AR solutions including mobile and WebAR experiences.

Its WebAR offering is designed for “no app” experiences that can be accessed through a browser, including activation through QR codes or URLs.

For brands, this type of WebAR approach can be useful when accessibility and campaign distribution are important.

However, businesses should distinguish between general WebAR/image-tracking experiences and specialized face-tracking virtual try-on. The exact capabilities should be verified against the specific implementation requirements.

8th Wall

8th Wall has been used for browser-based WebAR experiences, including face effects and image-target experiences.

Its platform documentation and examples demonstrate browser-based AR capabilities involving face effects, image targets, and other WebAR experiences.

For brands interested in WebAR, 8th Wall can be relevant when the objective extends beyond simple product try-on into broader interactive campaigns.

For a production eyewear try-on, however, the exact requirements for face tracking, 3D assets, frame fitting, browser support, and commerce integration should be evaluated separately.

MediaPipe

MediaPipe is a computer-vision framework from Google that developers can use as a foundation for custom applications.

Its Face Landmarker functionality provides face landmark detection, which can serve as an important component of a custom virtual try-on system.

A custom development team can potentially use facial landmarks to determine where digital glasses should be positioned and how they should move as the customer’s head changes position.

However, MediaPipe is a development technology rather than a complete plug-and-play eyewear commerce platform.

That means the development team may still need to implement:

Product rendering
Frame fitting
Occlusion
UI
Product catalog integration
Ecommerce functionality
Analytics

This makes MediaPipe particularly relevant when the business wants greater control over the technology stack.

ARKit

ARKit is Apple’s AR framework for iOS and iPadOS applications.

Apple’s face-tracking capabilities allow applications to detect facial position, topology, and expressions in real time.

For a native iOS virtual try-on application, ARKit can provide important AR capabilities.

However, developers still need to build the business-specific experience around the framework.

For example:

ARKit → Face Tracking → Custom Rendering → Product Catalog → Ecommerce

ARKit therefore fits naturally into a custom native application architecture.

ARCore

Google’s ARCore provides Android AR capabilities, including Augmented Faces.

Google’s documentation states that Augmented Faces provides face-region poses and a 3D face mesh that can be used for face-based AR experiences such as try-ons and effects.

Like ARKit, ARCore is a development framework rather than a complete eyewear ecommerce solution.

A custom Android application can combine ARCore with a company’s own:

Product database
3D models
Rendering engine
UI
Ecommerce functionality
Analytics

Custom vs SaaS: Which Technology Fits Where?

A useful way to think about the technology choices is:

Technology	Typical Role
Banuba	Commercial face AR and virtual try-on
DeepAR	Commercial AR and virtual try-on
ImagineAR	WebAR and branded AR experiences
8th Wall	WebAR and browser-based AR
MediaPipe	Computer vision and facial landmarks
ARKit	Native Apple AR development
ARCore	Native Android AR development

These technologies are not all direct competitors.

Some are commercial SDKs, while others are development frameworks. The appropriate choice depends on whether the business wants a ready-made platform, an SDK, or a foundation for custom development.

When Should You Consider a SaaS Virtual Try-On?

A SaaS platform may be appropriate when your business:

Wants to launch quickly
Has a limited development team
Wants to minimize initial development
Needs proven AR functionality
Does not require highly unusual features
Wants provider-managed infrastructure
Wants regular platform updates
Needs a relatively straightforward ecommerce integration

For example, a small eyewear brand could prioritize getting a functional try-on experience online without building an entire AR engineering team.

When Should You Consider Custom Virtual Try-On?

Custom development may be more appropriate when your business:

Needs complete UI/UX control
Has complex ecommerce requirements
Has a large product catalog
Requires custom product-fitting logic
Needs proprietary functionality
Wants deep integration with existing systems
Needs custom analytics
Has an internal engineering team
Wants greater control over the technology stack
Plans to make virtual try-on a core part of its digital product strategy

A custom solution can also be useful when virtual try-on is only one part of a larger AR shopping ecosystem.

Hybrid Approach: Custom Application + Commercial SDK

There is also a third option that businesses sometimes overlook.

You do not necessarily have to choose between:

100% SaaS

and

100% built from scratch.

A hybrid architecture can combine a commercial AR SDK with custom business software.

For example:

Banuba / DeepAR / Computer Vision Layer
↓
Custom Virtual Try-On Application
↓
Product Catalog
↓
Shopify / Ecommerce Platform
↓
Analytics + Customer Experience

This approach can provide a balance between development speed and customization.

Instead of spending years developing face tracking from scratch, the business can use an established computer-vision component while developing its own product experience.

Important Questions to Ask Before Choosing

Before selecting a virtual try-on solution, businesses should evaluate several questions.

1. How many products need virtual try-on?

A catalog containing 20 products has different requirements from a catalog containing 20,000 products.

2. Do you need 2D or 3D assets?

Simple implementations may use 2D overlays, while more advanced experiences can require detailed 3D models.

3. Do customers need browser-based try-on?

If customers should try products directly from a product page without installing an application, WebAR may be important.

4. Do you need native mobile applications?

If the experience is part of an existing iOS or Android app, native AR technologies such as ARKit and ARCore may become relevant.

5. How much customization is required?

The more unique the customer journey, the more attractive a custom architecture may become.

6. Who will maintain the technology?

A SaaS platform shifts much of the maintenance responsibility to the provider.

A custom solution requires an internal team or development partner to handle updates, testing, security, and compatibility.

7. How important is vendor independence?

Businesses should consider what happens if a SaaS provider changes:

Pricing
APIs
Features
Supported platforms
Licensing
Product direction

Vendor dependency should be part of the long-term planning process.

Total Cost of Ownership Matters

One of the most common mistakes businesses make is comparing only the initial development cost.

Instead, calculate:

Total Cost of Ownership = Development + Infrastructure + Licensing + Maintenance + Product Assets + Support + Future Development

For SaaS:

TCO = Subscription/Usage Fees + Integration + Product Assets + Customization + Ongoing Provider Costs

For custom:

TCO = Development + Infrastructure + Maintenance + Product Assets + Updates + Technical Support

A SaaS platform may have lower initial development costs, while a custom solution may provide greater control over long-term functionality.

The actual financial outcome depends on the company’s usage, requirements, development resources, and provider pricing.

Security and Privacy Considerations

Virtual try-on often involves camera access and potentially sensitive visual information.

Businesses should evaluate:

Where camera data is processed
Whether images are uploaded
Whether processing occurs on-device
What information is stored
How long information is retained
Which third parties receive data
Applicable privacy regulations
Customer consent requirements

For example, an architecture using on-device processing can have different privacy characteristics from one that sends images or video to a remote server.

These questions should be reviewed with the selected technology provider and the company’s legal/privacy teams.

Custom Virtual Try-On vs SaaS: A Practical Decision Framework

Instead of asking which approach is universally better, businesses can evaluate their requirements.

Choose a SaaS-oriented solution when:

Speed + simplicity + lower development effort are major priorities.

Consider custom development when:

Control + integration + unique functionality are major priorities.

Consider a hybrid architecture when:

You need commercial-grade AR capabilities combined with a highly customized business experience.

For example, an eyewear company could use a commercial face-tracking SDK while building its own Shopify integration, product catalog system, user interface, analytics, and recommendation engine.

How Zeanex Technologies Can Help

Zeanex Technologies can help businesses explore virtual try-on as part of a broader AR and digital commerce strategy.

Rather than treating virtual try-on as simply a camera filter, businesses can design an experience around the entire customer journey.

A solution can potentially connect:

Product Catalog → Virtual Try-On → Product Information → Recommendations → Shopping Cart → Analytics

For eyewear brands, this can create a more interactive product-discovery experience while keeping the virtual try-on feature connected to the existing ecommerce workflow.

Zeanex can also evaluate different technology approaches—including commercial SDKs, WebAR technologies, computer-vision frameworks, and native AR frameworks—to determine how they can fit a particular project.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the difference between custom virtual try-on and a SaaS virtual try-on platform?

A custom virtual try-on solution is developed specifically for a business’s products, branding, ecommerce platform, and technical requirements. A SaaS virtual try-on platform provides pre-built AR and computer-vision functionality that businesses can integrate through an SDK, API, widget, or platform.

2. Is custom virtual try-on more expensive than SaaS?

Custom virtual try-on usually requires a higher initial investment because it involves development, integration, testing, and ongoing maintenance. SaaS platforms generally have lower upfront development costs but may involve recurring subscription, usage, or licensing fees.

3. Which is faster to implement: custom virtual try-on or SaaS?

A SaaS platform is generally faster to implement because much of the underlying AR infrastructure and functionality is already available. Custom development typically takes longer because the experience must be designed, developed, integrated, and tested for the business’s specific requirements.

4. Can Banuba be used for a custom virtual try-on solution?

Yes. Banuba provides AR and face-tracking technologies that developers can integrate into custom applications and virtual try-on experiences. A business can use the underlying AR capabilities while building its own interface, product catalog integration, ecommerce workflow, and other business-specific functionality.

5. Can DeepAR be used for eyewear virtual try-on?

Yes. DeepAR provides AR capabilities for virtual try-on use cases, including eyewear. It can be considered when a business wants commercial face-tracking and AR functionality without developing the entire computer-vision system from scratch.

6. What role do MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore play in virtual try-on?

MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore can provide important computer-vision or AR capabilities for custom virtual try-on applications. MediaPipe can provide facial landmark and vision capabilities, while ARKit is Apple’s AR framework and ARCore is Google’s AR platform for Android. Developers can build customized virtual try-on experiences around these technologies.

7. Is 8th Wall suitable for virtual try-on?

8th Wall can be useful for browser-based WebAR experiences and can support AR experiences.

8. What is the role of ImagineAR in virtual try-on?

ImagineAR provides AR and WebAR technologies that can be used for branded and interactive AR experiences. Depending on the implementation, businesses can use WebAR to make experiences accessible through browsers. For a specialized eyewear try-on, businesses should verify the specific face-tracking and product-rendering capabilities required for their project.

9. When should a business choose a custom virtual try-on solution?

Custom development may be appropriate when a business needs extensive customization, complex ecommerce integration, proprietary functionality, custom analytics, specialized product fitting, or greater control over its technology and customer experience.

10. How can Zeanex Technologies help with virtual try-on?

Zeanex Technologies can help businesses plan and develop AR and virtual try-on experiences based on their products, ecommerce platforms, and customer requirements. Depending on the project, a solution can combine technologies such as Banuba, DeepAR, ImagineAR, 8th Wall, MediaPipe, ARKit, and ARCore with custom development and business-specific integrations.

Final Thoughts

The choice between custom virtual try-on and SaaS ultimately depends on the business’s technical requirements and long-term goals.

A SaaS platform can simplify implementation by providing ready-made AR capabilities, infrastructure, and ongoing platform support.

A custom solution provides greater control over the user experience, architecture, integrations, and future functionality.

There is also a middle ground: businesses can combine technologies such as Banuba, DeepAR, ImagineAR, 8th Wall, MediaPipe, ARKit, or ARCore with custom development to create a solution tailored to their requirements.

For businesses evaluating virtual try-on, the most important considerations are not simply the technology name or initial price. Consider the complete picture:

Customer experience
Product catalog size
Platform requirements
Accuracy and tracking
2D vs 3D assets
Ecommerce integration
Customization
Development resources
Privacy
Scalability
Maintenance
Long-term cost

The right architecture is the one that fits the company’s specific product, customers, technology environment, and business requirements.

Interested in building a virtual try-on experience for your eyewear business? Explore how Zeanex Studio approaches virtual glasses try-on and consider which architecture fits your product and ecommerce strategy.

Zeanex Technologies can help businesses explore AR-powered product experiences that connect digital technology with real-world products.

Zeanex Technologies can help businesses develop and deploy customized AR and virtual try-on experiences for eyewear and other product categories.

Zeanex Studio’s virtual glasses try-on solution is built using the ImagineAR SDK, which provides the AR technology used to create the real-time try-on experience. Zeanex Studio adds the business layer around it, including the admin panel, product management, analytics, QR code sharing, and website integration.

Learn more about our Virtual Try-On for Glasses solution:

Virtual Try-On for Glasses

Table of Contents